2. The First Three Charges

About this Lecture

Lecture

In this module, we outline the case against Cluentius, focusing in particular on: (i) the difficulty of reconstructing the charges against Cluentius given Cicero’s defence speech is our only source for the case; (ii) the poisoning of Gaius Vibius Capax; (iii) the poisoning of Balbutius; (iv) Balbutius’ connection to Oppianicus Junior, the man prosecuting Cluentius; (v) the poisoning of Oppianicus Senior; and (vi) the connection between the two Oppianici and between Oppianicus Senior and Cluentius himself.

Course

In this course, Dr Andrew Sillett (University of Oxford) explores Cicero’s Pro Cluentio. In the first module, we provide some of the key context for Cicero’s speech. When did the trial take place, and why is this important? What were the key features of the Roman court? How was a verdict reached? In the second module, we look at three of the four charges levelled against Cluentius, before turning in the third module to the fourth charge – a crime that relates to a trial that took place almost a decade previously. In the fourth module, we think about Cicero’s defensive strategy in this case, before moving on in the fifth module to explore the political context of that previous trial – a context that is fundamental to Cicero’s defence of his client – and why Cicero mentions it only in passing.

Lecturer

Andrew joined Brasenose in 2006 to study for his BA in Classics (Course IIA). Thanks to the generosity of the Helmore Fund, he was able to stay on for his MSt in Classical Languages & Literature. As a senior Germaine Scholar, he recently completed his DPhil on the early imperial reception of Cicero under the supervision of Llewelyn Morgan. His research interests include the reception of Cicero in the early imperial period, politics and thought in the late Roman Republic and early Principate.