You are not currently logged in. Please create an account or log in to view the full course.
4. Anti-Artistry in the Satires
About this Lecture
In this module, we think further about how satire positions itself as a literary genre in opposition to epic poetry, focusing in particular on: (i) the tension between the content of satire (i.e. its warts-and-all depiction of ‘real life’) and its metrical form (the dactylic hexameters of epic poetry); (ii) the ways in which Horace undermines epic metre with both his diction and his syntax at 1.1.6-8; (iii) Horace’s parody of epic at 1.99.100; (iv) the tension between the Greekness of epic and the Romanness of satire; (v) the tension between satire’s insistence on truth, no matter how unvarnished, and epic poetry’s highly stylised version of human existence; and (vi) the layers of meaning in Ofellus’ recommendation of “bread with a bit of salt” at 2.2.17.
In this course, Professor Llewelyn Morgan (University of Oxford) explores Horace’s Odes and Satires. The first two modules focus on the Odes. In the first, we think about the nature of Horace’s lyric poetry, focusing in particular on what Horace is trying to achieve with his Odes. In the second, we think about the precision of Horace’s composition – what Petronius referred to as his curiosa felicitas – looking at three examples from the set text. The next two modules focus on the Satires. In the first of these, we think about the origins of satire as a literary genre, while in the second we consider how satire positions itself as a genre in opposition to (but also in tension with) epic poetry. The last two modules consider Horace’s work as a whole. First, we think about the ways in which Horace’s poetic persona changes from the Satires to the Odes, but also the centrality of the theme of friendship (amicitia) in both collections. And finally, we think about an appeal Horace makes in both the Odes (3.6) and the Satires (2.2) and what it can tell us about Roman attitudes to the gods.
Llewelyn Morgan is a Classicist, a Fellow of Brasenose College, Oxford. The focus of most of his research is Roman literature and culture, and he is the author of the well-received study of Roman poetic form, Musa Pedestris: Metre and Meaning in Roman Verse (Oxford, 2010).
But he also has a longstanding fascination for Afghanistan, contemporary and historical, which he traces to his discovery, at an impressionable age, of a Russian samovar inscribed “Candahar 1881”. He has made several visits to Afghanistan in recent years, and his most recent book, The Buddhas of Bamiyan (Profile Books and Harvard University Press, 2012), traces the history of these remarkable monuments from their Buddhist origins 1,400 years ago, through their celebrity in Islamic wonder literature and European travel writing, up until their destruction in 2001.
Morgan is a regular public speaker, on many aspects of Classics and Afghanistan, appears occasionally on BBC Radio 4, and writes slightly less occasionally for the Times Literary Supplement.
Cite this Lecture
Morgan, L. (2019, December 23). Horace: Odes and Satires - Anti-Artistry in the Satires [Video]. MASSOLIT. https://www.massolit.io/courses/horace-odes-and-satires/anti-artistry-in-the-satires
Morgan, L. "Horace: Odes and Satires – Anti-Artistry in the Satires." MASSOLIT, uploaded by MASSOLIT, 23 Dec 2019, https://www.massolit.io/courses/horace-odes-and-satires/anti-artistry-in-the-satires